Bill
Bill > A1649
NJ A1649
"Daniel's Law" prohibits disclosure of certain personal information of active, formely active, and retired judicial officers, prosecutors, and law enforcement officers, and their family members; establishes crime and civil action for disclosing such information.
summary
Introduced
01/14/2020
01/14/2020
In Committee
10/22/2020
10/22/2020
Crossed Over
11/16/2020
11/16/2020
Passed
11/16/2020
11/16/2020
Dead
Signed/Enacted/Adopted
11/20/2020
11/20/2020
Introduced Session
2020-2021 Regular Session
Bill Summary
This bill prohibits persons, State and local agencies, and businesses from posting or publishing on the Internet the home addresses or unpublished home telephone numbers of judges, or State, county, or municipal prosecutors regardless of whether they are retired or in the workforce. This bill amends current law that already prohibits such disclosure for law enforcement officers. Specifically, the bill makes it a crime for a person to knowingly, with purpose to expose another to harassment or risk of harm to life or property, or in reckless disregard of the probability of this exposure, to post or publish on the Internet the home address or unpublished telephone number of a judge or State, county, or municipal prosecutor, regardless of whether they are retired or in the workforce, or their spouse or child. If the person recklessly violates this prohibition, it is a crime of the fourth degree. A fourth degree crime is punishable by a prison term of up to 18 months, a fine of up to $10,000, or both. If the person purposefully violates this prohibition, it is a crime of the third degree. A third degree crime is punishable by a prison term of three to five years, a fine of up to $15,000, or both. The bill also prohibits State or local agencies from posting or publishing on the Internet a home address or telephone number of a judge or State, county, or municipal prosecutor regardless of whether they are retired or in the workforce, without first obtaining written consent. Persons, businesses, and associations also are prohibited by the bill from disclosing on the Internet a judge's, or State, county, or municipal prosecutor's home address or unpublished home telephone number, regardless of whether they are retired or in the workforce, under circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that providing that information would expose another to harassment or risk of harm to life or property. The bill specifies that persons, businesses, or associations may be liable for violating this prohibition of the bill. The bill authorizes a civil action in Superior Court. The court may award: (1) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $1,000 for each violation; (2) punitive damages upon proof of willful or reckless disregard of the law; (3) reasonable attorney's fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred; and (4) any other preliminary and equitable relief as the court determines to be appropriate. The bill defines "disclose" as soliciting, selling, manufacturing, giving, providing, lending, trading, mailing, delivering, transferring, publishing, distributing, circulating, disseminating, presenting, exhibiting, advertising or offering.
Committee Categories
Budget and Finance, Government Affairs, Justice
Sponsors (29)
Ralph Caputo (D)*,
Craig Coughlin (D)*,
Joe Cryan (D)*,
Yvonne Lopez (D)*,
Nellie Pou (D)*,
Annette Quijano (D)*,
Nick Scutari (D)*,
Bob Singer (R)*,
Bob Smith (D)*,
Joe Danielsen (D),
Chris DePhillips (R),
Patrick Diegnan (D),
Serena DiMaso (R),
JoAnn Downey (D),
Roy Freiman (D),
Linda Greenstein (D),
Mila Jasey (D),
Sean Kean (R),
Joe Lagana (D),
John McKeon (D),
Angela Mcknight (D),
Pedro Mejia (D),
Gabriela Mosquera (D),
Nancy Pinkin (D),
Eliana Pintor Marin (D),
Lisa Swain (D),
Britnee Timberlake (D),
Chris Tully (D),
Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D),
Last Action
Approved P.L.2020, c.125. (on 11/20/2020)
Official Document
bill text
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...
bill summary
Loading...